Is the scope just fundamentally slow at processing the data or is there likely something wrong with it or the settings? Any advice anyone can offer would be appreciated. While I appreciate that the scope will take some time to process and display the signal, the scope is taking ~ 20 seconds to average 50 sweeps (which should take ~5 seconds to record) The scope is set to 200ns/div and is sampling at 500MS/s so is recording a 1kS record length so the amount of data doesn't seem to be huge. Hello, I wonder if anyone can help me with this, I have recently started to use a Wavesurfer 3024 and I am using it to collect and average signals, I am sending a signal to the scope at a frequency of 10Hz and am interested in averaging a signal a couple of microseconds long over 50 sweeps. They are very helpful and can try and duplicate the issue and determine if it is a bug or scope limitation.įrom: On Behalf Of p.lane via groups.io Sent: Tuesday, Ap9:49 AM To: Subject: Slow in scope averaging If not, definitely check in with Teledyne LeCroy tech support - especially given this is an active model (3000Z anyway). Let us know if either of those solves your problem. There were many issues that have seen improvements with the newer versions. If that doesn’t work, you may try updating to the latest firmware. I’ve found this normally corrects the slow down phenomenon – which seems to gradually accumulate and get worse after use without the occasional defaulting. Functions like the powerful FFT provide details of the frequency domain while averaging effectively filters noise out of the signal. Take note of your settings, do a default setup, and then manually reset things as you had them. That said, averaging with that sweep and number of points shouldn’t be that slow.
WAVESURFER 3024 AVERAGING SERIAL
Serial decode in pseudo real-time is basically a non-starter. It is not the greatest scope out there (mostly due to trying to cram too much features using an underpowered platform) but if it is cheap then why not. This is now quite old tech (released about 2014) so may not have aged well. But start trying to do a few things, and it really bogs down. I may have an opportunity to get a defective Wavesurfer 3024 200MHz Oscilloscope. We evaluated those scopes for our needs, and for day-to-day basic use it was fine. Well, in my opinion the WaveSurfer 3000 series are not LeCroy’s finest, but what you are seeing shouldn’t be that bad.
0 kommentar(er)
